CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:54:58 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I hope that this does not happen. The CQ WPX RTTY contest also has no
unassisted category.  This pushes operators to use the cluster to be
competitive instead of using their SO2R S&P skills.

John KK9A


To:     <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
From:   "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to:       k5zd@charter.net
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:07:34 -0000

There is another option...  Rather than continue to get twisted in defining
the separation, we could merge SO and SOA into one and remove all confusion.
There could be an overlay category for the guys who want to compare
themselves to other "classic" ops.

It seems only CQ, ARRL, and SAC maintain the assisted concept.  The rest of
the world has moved on.

Randy, K5ZD

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>