CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] All the Assisted ops, where do they all come from?

To: Contest List <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] All the Assisted ops, where do they all come from?
From: Mike Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 13:44:15 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
You bring up a great point, Ken! I had never thought of it that way, and you 
are right. The only way an unassisted station can say he is truly unassisted is 
to not be spotted by another operator, or by a robot. I guess one needs to 
clarify the rules that unassisted stations cannot run, they must stick with 
strictly S&P. Makes sense to me! 

73; 
Mike 
W7VO 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> 
To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:24:26 PM 
Subject: [CQ-Contest] All the Assisted ops, where do they all come from? 




The common definition of Assistance refers to single operators who use 
cluster spots, run their own skimmers or get some kind of outside help to find 
stations. On CW and RTTY the spots are now gathered by skimmer robots 
which efficiently skim up almost everything. On phone they are generated 
manually by humans so there are fewer spots, but all the big running stations 
and other significant stations get spotted. 

This Assistance is just one side of the coin, however. The other side is 
the running stations who get spotted. They count on being spotted to 
generate those huge runs and scores and if they claim to be Unassisted they are 
not being honest. These operators are also Assisted. 

The only truly Unassisted stations are those single operators doing only 
traditional S&P. These are often small operations and certainly do not 
include the big, famous winning stations that dominate the competitions. 

Given these definitions, the majority of single operator stations are 
Assisted which is why the two categories are converging, like it or not, and 
why Unassisted should be eliminated 

73, 
Ken, AB1J 




_______________________________________________ 
CQ-Contest mailing list 
CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>