| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Own skimmer ok? |
| From: | Dez Watson <g3ww.dez@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2016 13:14:06 +0100 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
This is Yuri's interpretation, so nothing has changed AFAIK. Quite rightly most of the major contest sponsors class skimmers, both local and remote, as Assistance. Skimmers are a such massive game changer. 73 de Dez, G3WW / M6W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Own Skimmer NOT OK in CQ WPX for Single Operator (unassisted), Terry Zivney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change Survey Results, 328 responses, Martin , LU5DX |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Own Skimmer NOT OK in CQ WPX for Single Operator (unassisted), Terry Zivney |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots?, Dave Edmonds |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |