Gosh, do you think anyone will understand what you just wrote (and what is
in the CQ WW FAQ)?
All those hundreds of emails for naught.
73,
Ken, AB1J
In a message dated 2016-09-30 3:07:08 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
jamesdavidcain@gmail.com writes:
> "I find this rule stupifying. Why do we bother sending the Zone at all?
> This reinforces what I've long felt about CQWW -- that it's the dumbest
> contest going. ALL you have to copy is the other station's call -- the
> rest of it is auto-filled from call history files and country files! 73,
> Jim K9YC"
I'm not a lawyer and I do not play one on telly, but the CQ FAQ seems
clear
to me:
Q: "I work a station and they do not know their CQ zone or they give me a
serial number, what should I put in the log?
"Log the zone based on their location."
We "bother sending the Zone at all" because people operate "out of their
Zone." Or their mind.
OTOH -- sending 599 or 59 in every exchange: now, that's dumb.
K1TN
>
> On Wed,9/28/2016 12:12 AM, Maarten van R wrote:
>
> Like David said, CQWW says you should log the correct zone based on the
> location, not what was send. Same thing with cut numbers used for CQ zone
> numbers.
>
> See:http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.htm
>
> This contradicts with the "log what was send" rule but it actually seems
> fairly logical. If the other station doesn't submit his log, the
> logchecker
> can not possibly know what was actually send but it does know what the
> correct zone number should be based on the location of the station.
> As others have asked, what happens when the other op does submit his log
> with the wrong number? Then the log checker does know what was send over
> the air.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|