CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Real Time Scoring and Quick Submissions

To: Kevan Nason <knason00@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Real Time Scoring and Quick Submissions
From: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:30:41 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Except I didn’t argue “some can’t therefore we shouldn’t”.

I argued “most won’t, but we should find a way for those who want to.”

73, kelly, ve4xt 

> On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:26 AM, Kevan Nason <knason00@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for feedback Kelly and I don't assume anyone is inferior to me.
> 
> Agree with your point about infrastructure and Heard Island and understood 
> there are situations the ability to get a real time score is not possible. 
> There are always exceptions. But most can. If you start from that point and 
> figure out a workable solution as to how to make it work for most then you 
> can figure out how to handle those exceptions. 
> 
> Starting at "some can't therefore we shouldn't" has stopped a lot of projects 
> over the years.
> 
> Kevan
> N4XL
> 
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net 
> <mailto:ve4xt@mymts.net>> wrote:
> > If you go to a place that doesn’t have the
> > net you aren’t likely to be using a competitive station and won’t have a
> > shot at beating your chest in triumph anyway.
> 
> I call BS on this one. Sorry.
> 
> Heard Island is going to rock a contest, simply by virtue of its rarity.
> 
> A cottage station in VE4 can rock SS, simply by virtue of Manitoba’s relative 
> rarity.
> 
> Just because you don’t have Internet doesn’t mean you don’t have access to 
> concrete or can only put up wires.
> 
> At least one winner of ARRL DX last year was a Field-Day style station, set 
> up on a cliff facing the U.S.
> 
> Some of these stories are some of the greatest stories we have. That 
> so-and-so won with more than a thousand feet of tower, 200 total elements and 
> more Alpha than Alpha Centauri isn’t a great story. A victory is almost 
> expected at that point.
> 
> You can’t assume everyone operates with the same infrastructure you do, and 
> you can’t assume those who don’t are automatically inferior.
> 
> Real-time scoring would be a great contest-within-a-contest. It would help 
> attract new contesters and push the boundaries of contest reporting. But 
> making it mandatory would drive away a large part of your existing customers. 
> More so, I’d argue, than it would attract.
> 
> 73, kelly, ve4xt,
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>