CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLing
From: Prasad VU2PTT <vu2ptt@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:26:47 +0530
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Jim

IOTA now has a viable electronic QSL method based on matches for your logs 
uploaded to ClubLog. I applied and received an award recently using that method.

73 de Prasad VU2PTT 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 31-Dec-2016, at 1:39 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri,12/30/2016 6:10 PM, W0MU wrote:
>> Postage overseas is beyond ridiculous these days. K1ZM said it costs more to 
>> ship his book overseas than the book costs!
> 
> Yes. The cost of international postage and shipping have made paper QSLs a 
> luxury that few of us can afford.  Sure, having a paper card for a rare or 
> difficult QSO is nice, but those costs have made it an anachronism. 
> Electronic QSLing has to be our standard practice. Last I looked, my average 
> cost for mailing my card and an SASE to a DX station  has reached $3.50 and 
> was fast approaching $4 as more countries raise their rates. As several 
> others have noted, that's not ARRL's fault!
> 
>> 
>> I don't support everything the ARRL does but I am not sure they are 
>> completely to blame here.
> 
> 
> From where I sit, LOTW is one of the very best things ARRL has done for ham 
> radio in the last 20 years. I no longer bother with awards that won't accept 
> LOTW or eQSL. That rules out county awards and it rules out IOTA unless and 
> until IOTA gets a workable and user-friendly electronic method going that 
> doesn't require paper cards.
> 
> I agree with Charly that the biggest problem with LOTW is getting more hams 
> to use it. I don't know what the obstacles are, but it needs serious 
> attention. I think part of it is motivation -- ham radio is pretty much run 
> by we old guys who don't have a dog in the race. We have our 300+ countries, 
> our Honor Rolls, our band slots, so many of us don't "get" what it means to 
> new hams. I'm certainly aware of it -- when I moved across the country 10 
> years ago, I started over on all my awards. It doesn't seem fair to me to 
> count QSOs made 2,000 miles closer to the DX. LOTW has saved my thousands of 
> dollars in postage as I've filled nearly 2,200 band and mode slots. That's 
> enough to buy a couple of nice radios!
> 
> As to the boxes and boxes of JA cards that have clogged the Bureau system to 
> the point of paralysis -- I have boxes full and no longer respond to JA 
> cards. Indeed, several years ago, I stopped responding to any paper cards 
> from stations that don't put their logs on LOTW.  When I was a kid in ham 
> radio, we said that a QSL was the final courtesy of a QSO, and we paid the 
> postage ourselves. In 2016, LOTW is the final courtesy of a QSO.
> 
> I'm happy to kick in to support a DXpedition, but I'm unwilling to dump my 
> retirement savings into the world's postal systems.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>