| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSOs |
| From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:12:53 -0400 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
If everyone is running assisted and sees the spot, what exactly is the purpose of dual CQing on the same band? One spot is enough for everyone to find the CQer. Is it speed? Maybe on CW it will add to speed just like synchronized CQing does in SO. But on SSB? Not sure its as effective. I think same band dual CQing made much more sense before spotting than it does today. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Exploding Noise Cancelling Headphones, Ria Jairam |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Exploding Noise Cancelling Headphones, donovanf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSOs, Jamie WW3S |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |