To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:58:13 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Wed,3/15/2017 5:52 PM, Radio K0HB wrote: I agree that SO-Split is equally hoggish if it consumes two QRG's in a single band segment. Operators should be DQed for working split during a contest. It consumes more than two frequencies, because the callers spread out, and others running on those frequencies get clobbered. I won't work ANYONE split during a contest. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation, Jeff AC0C |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSOs, Ed Sawyer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation, Radio K0HB |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Inovation, Ria Jairam |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |