CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY?
From: Joe Fischer <aa8ta@fischerhome.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 09:49:10 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yea, I think that I'm going to drop out of this group.  Sorry, hundreds of 
replies to one topic flooding my mailbox is tough to deal with.

Plus, I'm such a small fish in this big pond that most of these things will 
never apply to me.


Carry on.


GL es 73 de Joe AA8TA

---- On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 09:18:34 -0400  
&lt;cq-contest-request@contesting.com&gt; wrote ---- 

Message: 7 
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:08:08 -0400 
From: K1AR@aol.com 
To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? 
Message-ID: &lt;52e026.47ed4e81.45fc58b8@aol.com&gt; 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" 
 
OK everyone -- unless someone has something new and profound to offer, I 
suggest we move on to a new thread. How about a discussion on leveling the 
playing field in contesting? Or, perhaps the impact of spotting, RBN and 
packet on contest operating? Maybe we can debate the merits of combining 
assisted and unassisted. 
 
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
 
Something new folks? Anything? Please? 
 
Thank you. 
 
73, John, K1AR 





_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>