CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing

To: Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:02:36 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This kind of scrubbing to meet the 10 minute rule is akin to rubber
clocking and should not be allowed. This is where the recordings should
come in handy.

73
Ria, N2RJ

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

> A couple of the locals (and many of you, I am sure) found that we are not
> in
> the logs of a couple big-ish M/S's and M-2 Caribbean stations logs for the
> latest CQWW SSB 2016
>
> Both of us are very very careful with mults and have very low LCR % errors.
> (0.4% NIL's) (14 calls out of 3112 QSO's)
>
>
>
> At first I thought maybe they just fat fingered our callsigns, but it was
> too much of a coincidence so we went digging.
>
>
>
> We saw the open (public) logs and see some big gaps (where our QSO's should
> be at) and 'surmise' their logs have been scrubbed of common, non-mult
> contacts to meet the 10minute and only work mults QSO rules for M-S & M-2
> operations.
>
>
>
> Should THIS really be allowed?  If I work someone in good faith, I
> certainly
> don't expect to be scrubbed from their log because they were cheating.
>
>
>
> I've seen it all now.. Do I have to say "59 - 5, please don't scrub me from
> your log" ;-) <tic>
>
>
>
> Now *I* am paying because others are cheating.
>
>
>
> Mike VE9AA
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike, Coreen & Corey
>
> Keswick Ridge, NB
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>