CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Broken calls

To: "'NM5M'" <nm5m@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Broken calls
From: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:58:56 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Nobody did that research and comparison. So I tend to disagree.

Yuri

-----Original Message-----
From: NM5M [mailto:nm5m@aol.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:31 PM
To: Yuri
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Broken calls

Well the fast guys lose points if they don't.  

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 15, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net> wrote:
> 
> So, I guess now everybody slows down in RDXC...  :-) :-)
> 
> Yuri
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of NM5M 
> via CQ-Contest
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 12:58 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Broken calls
> 
> Best way to slow some of these ops down is to implement scoring that requires 
> both sides copy all the information correctly for the QSO to count.
> 
> Don't the Russians already do that in their Contest?
> 
> DE NM5M
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>