CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Can you not hear me now?

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Can you not hear me now?
From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:28:42 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I was curious about the same things. I have not yet used JT65 but I
got very interested in it after a presentation at the VHF Weak-Signal
Forum at Dayton this year. I have downloaded the software and want to
play with it.

Would I use it in a VHF contest? I don't know yet. So far I have
entered most VHF contests as a Single-Op QRP Portable. I don't take a
computer along.  I log on paper and then enter the log into the
computer when I get home. A computer running JT65 would be something
else to drain my battery, and I am usually trying to conserve battery
power as much as possible.  I've been on a pretty tight budget the
last couple years and don't want to buy another battery. But I do want
to experiment with JT65 at home and see how I like it.

73, Zack W9SZ


On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:15 PM, John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com> wrote:
> You bring up a good point about digital modes Tor.  From watching the DX
> cluster, it seemed that quite a few stations probably spent most of the
> contest on 50.276 running JT65.  Also, how do you keep from QRMing each
> other when several stations are all on 50.276?
>
> 73 John AF5CC
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:45 PM, RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> Somewhat off-topic, but with meteor scatter (even when using MSK144), you
>> usually CAN hear the other signals. The advantage of MSK144 over ear copy
>> is that it can send information in very short meteor bursts that are not
>> long enough for SSB.
>> An equal problem on VHF seems to be that many people are going to digital
>> modes by default, even when signals might be very strong. This makes qsos
>> take much much longer than necessary (one transmission on JT65 for example
>> takes 1 minute). I made one MSK144 qso during the contest with a station
>> 800 miles away on 2m. He was 56-57 (via tropo) and the qso would have been
>> much easier and faster on SSB. He could have probably worked many more
>> stations by calling cq using SSB.
>>
>> Similarly, 50.276 is now jammed with JT65 during 6m openings. Nearly all
>> of the qsos I have made there have been with signals strong enough for easy
>> CW/SSB copy, but using JT65 forces each qso to take several minutes just to
>> exchange a report and grid.
>>
>> Tor
>> N4OGW
>>
>>     On Thursday, June 15, 2017 7:16 AM, James Cain <
>> jamesdavidcain@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>   The latest ARRL Contest Update newsletter summarized some 3830 ARRL June
>> VHF  Contest comments as follows:
>>
>>  "In the soapbox comments from the most recent June ARRL VHF Contest many
>> stations were reporting the use of the MSK144 digital mode for making QSOs
>> where a SSB or CW path did not appear to exist. MSK144 can be sent and
>> received using the WSJT-X program by Joe Taylor, K1JT. MSK144 uses
>> exchange  sequences as fast a five seconds to take advantage of propagation
>> that might
>>  occur due to meteor scatter."
>>
>>  Way back in the ancient days of radio there was a saying:
>>
>>  "You can't work them if you can't hear them."
>>
>> Maybe we need an updated saying:
>>
>>  "You can work them even if you can't hear them."
>>
>>  K1TN
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br />
<table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
        <tr>
        <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon";
target="_blank"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif";
alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
/></a></td>
                <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e;
font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link";
target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a>
                </td>
        </tr>
</table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
height="1"></a></div>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>