It sounds like the trade is a feeling of "even playing field" vs painfully slow
conditions for the stronger stations. 2 an hour for the big guns while the
smaller stations do 30 an hour and catch up. The ones catching up don't want
it to change and the ones enduring 2 an hour are saying "this is getting to be
too slow to endure".
Sounds to me like the solution is for the smaller pistols to get more of their
friends to join in on SS.
73
Ed N1UR
-----Original Message-----
From: Chet Moore [mailto:Chetmoore@cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 1:29 PM
To: sawyered@earthlink.net; 'Art Peters'; 'CQ-Contest'
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Be careful what you wish for
I dont know about the new hams in the last 7 years but my love for SS goes back
to it being the only contest I could even compete in having only a vertical,
wires and low power for my first 5 years in ham radio and living in an
apartment. my interest was not scientific, it was simply the best I could do
at the time. I was outconus for most of that time, a conditional licensee, and
usually the only ham at the locations where I happened to be. while i am a life
member now, I was not a qst subscriber then. My first SS operation came from
trying to have a rag chew with a ss participant who asked me if I was in the
ss contest. I didn't know what a contest was. He explained the exchange,(all
done on cw) told me what my exchange should be and except for some time in iraq
and bahrain, I have never missed an ss since. I'm not advocating for any
changes but if they are made "CHAMPIONS ADJUST !!"
73
Chet WA4KJR, WA4KJR/VO1,N6ZO, KL7AIZ, KG4ZO VQ9XX, ZD8W, KP4EAJ N6ZO/6y5
N6ZO/HH9
Chet N4FX
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ed
Sawyer
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 9:53 AM
To: 'Art Peters'; 'CQ-Contest'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful what you wish for
Hello Art. No offense intended. I believe that people getting involved in SS
in the past 10 years and considering it their favorite contest are a rarity
indeed. The submitted log numbers and complaints of dwindling Sunday activity
by the regulars would not be what they are if there were noticeably more people
like yourself.
I am glad you enjoy SS. I have no beef with it. I am also not complaining
about it. Just offering a possible explanation to the complainers and
suggesting that their complaint cannot be substantiated across other HF contest
activity data or experiences.
Ed N1UR
-----Original Message-----
From: Art Peters [mailto:k0acp@k0acp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 8:58 AM
To: sawyered@earthlink.net; CQ-Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful what you wish for
Ed,
I have to take exception to your comment, I may be able to see old-Timer from
where I am, but have only been contesting with any sort of intensity for the
last 7-years. SS is one of, if not my favorite contest, partly due to my
station configuration, and partially it is the intricacy of attaining all 83
sections, which while a lot of work, it is doable. So I’d have to respectfully
submit that the great thing about (Ham Radio / America) is that everyone is
entitled to their opinion...
73 es God Bless,
Art / K0ACP
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 7, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> SS has been an old timers contest for as long as I have been
> contesting -
> 20+ years. Virtually no one coming into contesting in the last 2
> 20+ decades is
> a gung ho SS competitor. The SS group is growing old or dieing off.
>
>
>
> But don't compare that to most other contests. CQ WW SSB was amazing.
> Rate meter spending LONG times above 200 and 300 peaks observed
> numerous times during the weekend. 3000 - 4600 Qs logged by the top
> 10 US HP and 9000 Qs logged by 8P5A SOAB HP leader. CQ WW CW has been
> no exception in the past to be as much if not more volume of Qs than the SSB
> contest.
>
>
>
> SS has a problem - that is not debatable. But SSB contesting and CW
> contesting don't show signs of problems in most other contests. In
> fact - until this last year of greatly diminishing sunspots - have
> been on a decade long growth trend globally.
>
>
>
> Its easy to fix the boredom of SS. But its not easy to do it and keep
> it the same old SS. Choices need to be made.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|