CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS

To: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS
From: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:46:36 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
But the RS in the RST is completely subjective.  What is S9-extremely
strong signals-compared to?  I choose to compare them all to the signal
being sent back to Earth by Pioneer 10.

73 John AF5CC

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org> wrote:

> On the subject of the appropriateness of sending something other than the
> correct year-first-licensed as a check during SS, allow me to play devil's
> advocate.
>
> Isn't a signal report part of the required exchange in many contests?
>
> I wonder how many folks who want accurate SS checks ever send anything
> other than 5NN / 59 / 599 as their signal reports in those contests.
>
> --
> Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>