CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS

To: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS
From: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 21:02:29 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Mike’s right. FFS, the League, which is the FINAL arbiter of all things 
ruleswise, has said it doesn’t matter, as long as people copy what you send..

Ergo, it DOESN’T MATTER. Copy what is sent, move on to the next Q. Save your 
mental energy for things that really matter.

73, kelly, ve4xt 


> On Nov 8, 2017, at 7:15 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
> 
> This discussion has been going on now for what as long at the CQ-Contest 
> reflector has been around and yet most people still send their check right.
> 
> Just copy what is sent and move on.  The data sent and received has no 
> meaning.  It is an arbitrary part of the exchange.  Why not make it your grid 
> square.  Then it can't change and would go along well with the new ARRL 
> operating event for next year...............Grid squares worked!
> 
> W0MU
> 
> 
> On 11/8/2017 5:17 PM, Mike/W5JR wrote:
>> Sounds like everyone is going to be sending "55" next year.
>> 
>> tnx
>> Mike / W5JR
>> Alpharetta GA
>> 
>> sent via my HP95LX
>> 
>>> On Nov 8, 2017, at 2:37 PM, John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> What is the point of the ARRL stating in the rules that the check is the
>>> year first licensed, if they really don't care what you send?
>>> 
>>> 73 John AF5CC
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:51 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I think most people try to use their actual year licensed.
>>>> 
>>>> That would be a good question to ask on the entry form.   What year were
>>>> you licensed.  It think we all know that new hams are hard to come by and
>>>> many are not interested in contesting.
>>>> 
>>>> W0MU
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11/7/2017 1:54 PM, ShelbyK4WW wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why are so many putting so much emphasis on the CK, as anything more than
>>>>> a
>>>>> "randomly chosen two digit number that is consistently used throughout the
>>>>> contest", having absolutely no relation to anything? ARRL has indicated it
>>>>> will not enforce the CK as being "The last 2 digits of the year of first
>>>>> license for either the operator or the station", and many have indicated
>>>>> that they change their CK, from year to year? It certainly has little, if
>>>>> any, bearing on when they were licensed?
>>>>> As far as CW speed is concerned, when I call another station, I feel
>>>>> obligated to try and match their speed. Sometimes this requires me to
>>>>> listen to several contacts, before calling. I expect, and usually receive,
>>>>> the same consideration, when I'm called? I fail to see any logic to
>>>>> calling
>>>>> at a much higher speed, then having to endure several repeats?
>>>>> 
>>>>> In it to win it? Not a chance
>>>>> In it to have fun? Most definitely
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73, Shelby - K4WW
>>>>> As I don't have an iPad nor iPhone, sent from my PC
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>