CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CW slow? No problem

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW slow? No problem
From: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:05:23 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If someone answers you at 10 - 15 wpm and sends their exchange twice,
chances are someone in their skip zone that can't hear them will come on
and start CQ'ing on your frequency because there is a LONG pause and they
think no one is there.  73
Tom W7WHY.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org> wrote:

> While 45 might seem a bit excessive, guys like ZF2MJ and TI7W, known
> World-class contesters, were using speeds like that.  As a run op at an
> M/2,
> I spent 95 percent of my CQ time at 40 WPM and backed down to 38 at times.
> I did not feel it was non productive.
>
> Fast CW is impearitive to make 20 to 30 million point scores.  Also,
> To make those scores, the operators on the other end of the pile must
> Be able to copy.
>
> So. if your CW speed does not cut it, listen to QSOs until you copy.
> Fast CW can and will be a part of these contests.  Attempting to  claim it
> is non productive is disproven by the facts.
>
> 73, Gerry W1VE
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>