RBN captures CQs (I believe only/mostly CQs) so what you’re seeing here is
the average speed of CQs, not necessarily the speed at which someone is
running a pileup.
Thus, CQing QRQ seems not to be favoring winners.
Ria
N2RJ
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:29 AM K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us> wrote:
> My point was NOT about average speed, just the speeds when the rate is
> very low and lots of CQ's are going unanswered. When the rate is high,
> it makes sense to go QRQ.
>
> 73,
> Scott K9MA
>
> On 11/30/2017 10:33, Ria Jairam wrote:
> > That seemed suspect so I decided to do an analysis.
> >
> > Speeds are taken from RBN, scores are from 3830. These are the top
> > world scores in competitive categories.
> >
> > M/2 - CR3W ~30M points - average 30WPM
> > M/M - M6T ~18M points - average 30WPM
> > M/S - EF8R ~32M points - average 40WPM
> > M/S LP - VP5M ~ 6.6M points - average 30WPM
> > SOAB HP - CR3OO ~15.2M points - average 40WPM
> > SOAB LP - V26K ~10.3M points - average 33WPM
> > Assisted HP - DL6FBL ~8.2M points - average 32WPM
> > Assisted LP - P40W ~7.5M points - average 35WPM
> > Classic HP - KQ2M ~3.2M points - average 32WPM
> > Classic LP - KQ2M ~1.5M points - average 31WPM
>
>
> --
> Scott K9MA
>
> k9ma@sdellington.us
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|