CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Wireless Headphone System

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Wireless Headphone System
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 10:24:35 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Wow!
I guess Contesting is not an aspect of this hobby for those with not a lot of money.

I am amazed at the level of Flames and number of them, I got from MANY people on this E-Mail list about my comment about $200 dollars being "Low Cost".

AGAIN! I was NOT picking on him about the product he was posting about. Just the comment about it being "LOW COST" Alternate or not.

I guess I am in a super minority here. But I'm sorry, $200 dollars is close to 50% of my whole station cost! So at least to me it isn't "Low Cost" Even relative to what one Flamer Said of being a "Low Cost" "Alternative". Even being an "Alternative" Low Cost is Relative.

Like a 2017 BMW ALPINA B7 - at a "Low Cost" of $137,000

Compared to a

Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 Coupe $397,500

The Beemer is Low cost.  But is it?

Again, I'm a Minority here I guess, When my whole station cost less than $500 bucks, and 90% of the other hams that are local to me that I know, in my neighborhood $200 is far from "Low Cost"

I mean Like Many many have no hesitation to go out and buy a almost $100 dollar Signal-link so they can try FT-8. Yet I have been having a Blast on FT-8, and my "Signal-link" is lucky to have $10 bucks of parts in it and 30 minutes of assembly time. And thats even at Radio Shack parts prices.

Sorry gang for this message.  But I was truly amazed at the level of off list Flaming I got for that comment.

Joe WB9SBD




---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>