CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges
From: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:44:46 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Bob,

You left out the /QRP at the end, which is always copiable.  Funny how the selective fade always happens during the real suffix.

Barry W2UP

On 2/19/2018 1:06 PM, Bob Shohet, KQ2M wrote:
Is that like when during your run, the station (always weak and slow) comes 
back to you and sends your call twice and then his call twice (and then others, 
in their impatience, dump in their call while still others tune and still 
others call cq on you) all before he sends his report  INCORRECTLY and then has 
to send it again?   :-)

KQ2M:  TU KQ2M

IU4***:    KQ2M  KQ2M de IU4*** IU4***  599 dit dit dit dah dah dah  (obscured 
by impatient callers)

(IZ2***, UR7**, and OL**  all call simultaneously)  and CQer:

TEST, N4**, N4**


KQ2M:  IU4***, PSE AGN

IU4***:    KQ2M  KQ2M de IU4*** IU4***  599 dit dit dit dah dah dah  (obscured 
by callers)

repeat....   UGH!   :-)


NOTE:  The partial calls have been changed to protect the innocent.   :-)


73

Bob, KQ2M


From: John Dorr
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 2:46 PM
To: Mike Smith VE9AA
Cc: CQ-Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges

Let's not forget about a particularly favorite exchange addition of mine:
"Please copy..."

It's as if your mama taught proper social graces by saying, "If you're not
polite with these contesters, they won't work you."

Please don't say please copy. Please?

73, John, K1AR

PS: Of course, this example is actually another reason why Phone operating
should be deleted altogether along with Abu Ail and Geyser Reef. That is
unless you are operating from a place able to generate 400 hours. Then it's
mostly OK. :-)


On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

I usually adhere to the "log what is sent" mantra.



A little off tangent, but a reasonably strong EU sent me "UTT" this
weekend.
That's no issue, I get it's 200,  however the odd thing was that he sent
that as a cut # presumably to save time (or to sound uber cool I s'pose)
but
it failed because all of all the other wasted time he used up.



Me: CQ VE9AA TEST

Him: DL1ABC (a made up callsign..sorry to the real DL1ABC who might
eventually read this post)

Me: DL1ABC 5NN NB

Him: VE9AA UTT UTT UTT DL1ABC K

Me: TU VE9AA



I know UTT is 200w and I totally get it...sending my call (I already know
it) and UTT 3 flippin' times (I got it after the first time) then followed
by DL1ABC (I had already sent DL1ABC) is a loooootttttttt of wasted time.



I do get that it's a contest, not a job or a legal document and more than
likely was just a casual participant.  I myself am guilty of OCCASIONALLY
sending someones name or GE or an extra DIT DIT, but not for every Q.



Not sure why cut numbers are so rampant in EU.  I blame his club or his
mentor or whoever helped him program his macros.  They need a slap.  Same
as
that guy over on one of the contest logger forums who wanted a way to send
everyones exchange back to them.  NO, don't do it.   PLEASE.



Mike VE9AA

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>