| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Aug 2018 08:48:41 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 8/7/2018 6:48 AM, N4ZR wrote: ARRL 160 CW and ARRL 10M contests got rid of this anachronism a few years ago - it's time for NAQP to follow suit. I don't know who decides such things, but trust that Chris will know who needs to take action. I strongly disagree. NAQP is what it is BECAUSE of the no-cluster, Low Power Rule. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 2018 Hamvention Antenna forum papers now posted, Edward Mccann via TowerTalk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary of Software and Transceivers used by WRTC teams, Jim Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP, Richard Zalewski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP, Jeff Clarke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |