Re the comments by others, below, I disagree. Discussions about the FT
modes absolutely belong on this reflector, because the FT modes are an
existential threat to shortwave amateur radio that some of us have known
for more than half a century.
If this reflector can "discuss" cut numbers and the morality of using Super
Check Partial, then it sure as hell can discuss QSO credit for logging
inaudible signals.
Jim Cain, K1TN
-----
"I suggest that discussions like this be moved over to the rttydigital
reflector
https://groups.io/g/rttydigital
In November of 2018, folks on the rtty Reflector got tired of seeing postings
about FT8 and FT4. The rttydigital Reflector was formed at that time for
discussions of ALL digital modes. There are a lot of contesters on that
reflector.
Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ"
" … in my 24 or so years on CQ-Contest (and on Towertalk, before
CQ-Contest was born), I've seen these things come and go many times.
I would encourage the moderators to exercise their influence to
deflect the group back to more mainstream concerns. This too shall
pass.
73, Pete N4ZR"
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|