CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Clean Sweep - a short history

To: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>, CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Clean Sweep - a short history
From: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 12:33:45 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hans,Something you left out is creating some of these new sections gives people 
who reside there a competitive advantage. Take for example NNY. New York is one 
of the most populous states in the country but that part of the state is less 
populated which probably means less hams. If someone gets on from a section 
like that they get big pileups of stations trying to work them. There are lots 
of people whose only goal is to only work a sweep in Sweepstakes.  So if you 
live in a highly populated section like EPA or MDC those stations might not 
work you.Like many others mentioned the ARRL is very inconsistent how they 
choose sections. I made an argument in another post that maybe Georgia, where I 
live, should be split into two sections. We have the 8th largest population in 
the US. Many might not realize that Georgia has the largest land mass of any 
state east of the Mississippi. You could also make an argument for Minnesota, 
where you live. Your number 21 in population but are 14th in land mass. That 
means MN is bigger than states like WA, NY, MA, PA and NJ that have multiple 
sections. Texas has only three sections and is the biggest state on the US 
mainland plus number two in population. California in comparison has NINE 
sections. Florida like Texas has three sections but it's population is almost 8 
million less and it's land mass is smaller. Just too many inconsistencies in my 
opinion JeffSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com> Date: 
1/4/20  10:16 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Clean Sweep - a short history There is discussion in 
another thread over a new Section in RAC which results in a new mult in ARRL’s 
November SS weekends.The reason for this linkage seems not well understood by 
some.This linkage stems from the fact that Canada, up until about 40 years ago, 
was a Division of ARRL, with a Division Director and was subdivided into 
Sections just like other Divisions.  Just like some USA sections sometimes do 
not encompass a full state/territory (several states consist of more than one 
section) or a single state/territory (PAC division consists of a state, a 
territory, and some other possessions), not all Canadian sections are a 
complete province (think ON) or encompass more than a single province/territory 
(think VE8/VY1/Et al).Since SS has always used Sections as mults, and since 
CRRL/RAC continues to be organized by Section, then a new Section in either 
ARRL or in RAC will generate a new mult in November SS.And all of that aside, 
why would a contester have angst over more multipliers and the obvious 
opportunity for higher scores?73, de Hans, KØHB“Just a Boy and his 
Radio”_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing 
listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>