CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [cwops] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns

To: cq-contest@contesting.com, cwops <cwops@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [cwops] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns
From: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 15:43:48 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi John, 


Look up "key clicks" in the index of your ARRL Radio Amateur's 
Handbook or read George Grammer's excellent article in October 
1966 QST: 


p1k.arrl.org/pubs_archive/54578 


or W8JI's article here: 


www.w8ji.com/what_causes_clicks.htm 


73 
Frank 
W3LPL 






----- Original Message -----

From: mcveyj67@yahoo.com 
To: donovanf@starpower.net 
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com, "cwops" <cwops@groups.io> 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2020 7:03:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [cwops] [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns 


For those of us who might not understand the issue, could you explain the 
problem with the key clicks, fast CW rise times, etc., please? 


Thanks, 


John McVey, K4AFE 


On Jun 6, 2020 13:37, donovanf@starpower.net wrote: 




That's an excellent step forward Bud. There's no excuse for intentional 
key clicks but that's exactly the place where the Japanese manufacturers 
have intentionally put us in 2020. 


The current generation of Japanese transceivers are making key click 
problems much worse than before. Our only hope is that contest 
sponsors improve their rules and enforce them against contesters 
taking advantage of the fast CW rise time menu options in their radios. 


Manufacturers are completely irresponsible with their 4 millisecond 
default CW rise times and egregiously irresponsible with menus 
options that allow users to select 1 and 2 millisecond rise times. 




Kenwood and Yaesu provide completely unacceptable 1 and 2 
millisecond rise time menu options and Icom is almost as bad with 
their 2 millisecond menu option. 


Why are ARRL and the U.S. distributors not communicating with our 
Japanese equipment manufacturers about the problems they're causing 
and enabling? 



73 
Frank 
W3LPL 



From: "cqwpx director" <cqwpx.director@gmail.com> 
To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2020 4:58:15 PM 
Subject: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns 

I have received two (2) actionable complaints of signal quality issues 
during WPX CW, which are both under review. 



We will investigate additional signal quality concerns. Please provide the 
call to be reviewed, along with the date, time and band of the observed 
signal quality issue. 



73, 



Bud Trench, AA3B 

Director, CQ WPX Contest 

web: <https://cqwpx.com> https://cqwpx.com 

email: <mailto:director@cqwpx.com> director@cqwpx.com 





_______________________________________________ 
CQ-Contest mailing list 
CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 




_._,_._,_ 
Groups.io Links: 
You receive all messages sent to this group. 
View/Reply Online (#39281) | Reply To Sender | Reply To Group | Mute This Topic 
| New Topic 

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [mcveyj67@yahoo.com] 

_._,_._,_ 



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>