Well, OK, if you say so. But based on some of the recent messages since this
morning, it looks more likely that there is some... disagreements on what it is
or isn't, especially in relation to "dueling CQs".
73
-----Original Message-----
From: john@kk9a.com
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 19, 2021 8:24 am
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"
I believe most CQ-Contest readers do know what 2BSIQ is. CT1BOH gave
it that name after the 2016 CQWW CW contest and the acronym has been
mentioned on this list over 130 times. How many operators can do it
well? I suspect not many.
John KK9A
Ron W3WN wrote
In Jim’s defense... I can believe him. I didn’t know what the acronym
stood for, either.
And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.
73, ron w3wn
> OZ2I Henning wrote:
>
> K9YC, Jim
> And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would you
> just point something out !
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|