To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted" |
From: | Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:19:11 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I've never done 2BSIQ but I think most people who do it setup N1MM
Logger as SO2R and alternate CQ's between the two radios like N2IC said.
When they are working someone on one radio and copying the exchange they
call CQ on the other radio. It's important to have a lockout so you
don't transmit two signals at a time because that would break the rules
and put you in the Multi-2 category. It's very similar to SO2R with the
exception being you are running with two radios on two different bands.
Jeff On 3/19/2021 09:51 AM, Steve London wrote: The N1MM dueling CQ feature has nothing to do with 2BSIQ. It simply flip-flops CQ's between two radios.73, Steve, N2IC On 03/18/2021 09:55 PM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:Calling it “dueling CQs” like N1MM does it makes it instantly understandable. Ria N2RJ On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:09 PM Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest < cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:In Jim’s defense... I can believe him. I didn’t know what the acronym stood for, either. And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones. 73, ron w3wnOn Mar 18, 2021, at 6:07 PM, OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk> wrote: @K9YC JimAnd you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would youjust point something out ! Categories and Assisted and SO2R and . . . . Isn't it all about the way results are presented to the public ? Why is it so hard to make OVERLAYs and put the results on-line? I think it is all about sorting the final results. Take a look of the listings in the SAC Booklet 2020 -https://www.sactest.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Booklet-2020.pdf----------------------------------- * Vy 73 de OZ2I Henning * ----------------------------------- Den tor. 18. mar. 2021 kl. 17.11 skrev Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com:On 3/17/2021 2:06 PM, ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest wrote:It seems the top scores in CW contesting from now on will be dominatedby those ops capable of 2BSIQ. What is 2BSIQ? 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted", Steve London |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted", Zack Widup |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted", Steve London |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted", Martin, LU5DX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |