Honestly, I thought that was SO2R.
we did that on a 6 and 2 meter stations for Field Day.
And of course this incredible operating I also thought was SO2R.
https://youtu.be/bIW1Z1uFbRw
So that was a great But I guess it is the 2BSIQ
so what is SO2R?
Joe WB9SBD
On 3/18/2021 7:54 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest wrote:
In Jim’s defense... I can believe him. I didn’t know what the acronym stood
for, either.
And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.
73, ron w3wn
On Mar 18, 2021, at 6:07 PM, OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk> wrote:
@K9YC Jim
And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would you
just point something out !
Categories and Assisted and SO2R and . . . .
Isn't it all about the way results are presented to the public ?
Why is it so hard to make OVERLAYs and put the results on-line?
I think it is all about sorting the final results.
Take a look of the listings in the SAC Booklet 2020 -
https://www.sactest.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Booklet-2020.pdf
-----------------------------------
* Vy 73 de OZ2I Henning *
-----------------------------------
Den tor. 18. mar. 2021 kl. 17.11 skrev Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com
:
On 3/17/2021 2:06 PM, ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest wrote:
It seems the top scores in CW contesting from now on will be dominated
by those ops capable of 2BSIQ.
What is 2BSIQ?
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|