CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] IC-7300 VS IC-7410

To: Joe <nss@mwt.net>, donovanf@erols.com, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IC-7300 VS IC-7410
From: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:13:02 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
No one mentioned the Kenwood TS590SG. I own one that I use as a 2nd radio. I 
think it's a pretty good radio. When I do SO2R with bandpass filters there 
doesn't seem to be any interference between it and my K3. I remember when I 
owned an IC756PRO2 it got into the K3 pretty good even with bandpass filters.We 
also use it when we go mobile as W4AN in the QSO parties.JeffSent from my 
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Joe <nss@mwt.net> Date: 3/31/21  4:59 
PM  (GMT-05:00) To: donovanf@erols.com, CQ-Contest@contesting.com Subject: Re: 
[CQ-Contest] IC-7300 VS IC-7410 OK,The trend I see here is pretty strong Kill 
the 7300.OK how about a possible third Option?The KX3 with it's 100 watt 
amp?Joe WB9SBDOn 3/31/2021 1:16 PM, donovanf@erols.com wrote:> Hi Joe,>>> I 
don't know about the IC-7410, but the IC-7300 is about the worst> transceiver 
you could ever use for Field Day unless you're planning> a one transmitter 
entry.>> IC-7300 transmitted phase noise makes it impossible for any other> 
transceiver to operate on the same band, and likely you will> need a high 
quality bandpass filter to operate another transceiver> on any another band 
with an antenna in proximity to the IC-7300's> antenna.>>> Its hard to beat the 
performance of the Elecraft K3 for a light weight.> very low transmitted noise, 
high performance Field Day transceiver.> The FTdx101D is also excellent hig
 h performance, reasonably> light weight Field Day radio.>>> If you don't have 
access to any of those, the trusty old FT-1000MP> is an excellent Field Day 
transceiver that outperforms most modern> radios from a transmitted noise 
perspective and its receiver performance> is generally acceptable.>>> 73> 
Frank> W3LPL>> ----- Original Message ----->> From: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>> To: 
CQ-Contest@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 3:30:38 PM> Subject: 
[CQ-Contest] IC-7300 VS IC-7410>> Trying to decide which Rig to Use IC-7300 VS 
IC-7410.>> Last year Field Day was a Bust. But it looks pretty promising that 
this> year it could be really close to a traditional Field Day YAY!>> Now In 
past years in my local club I am the only CW op of the group. Sad> I know. And 
I'm just too old to do 24 hours single Op anymore.>> So in years past when a 
phone or digital station would be taking a break> for whatever reason, I would 
sit down and use the station and make as> many CW contacts as I could
  until the other Op's came back. It worked> OK, Over the weekend Id make a few 
hundred CW contacts the club would> not have had.>> BUT this year is Different, 
A new guy moved in, and he's also a CW man!> YES! So we said we will for Field 
Day this year make a dedicated CW station!>> Now we are trying to decide which 
of those two rigs would be best at> Field Day?>> Most if not ALL rigs (most 
times we run 5A) have Band pass filters, like.> 
https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/lbs-pb-f200-14?rrec=true>> And if we don't 
have one of those, we have many coaxial stub notches we> can add to an 
offending station.>> So usually when we want to try to decide what Radio we 
want to use, if> there is a choice, and no one really has a personal 
preference, we> usually go by the Data Bob gives us at,> 
http://www.sherweng.com/table.html>> Using the Sorted by Third-Order Dynamic 
Range Narrow Spaced - or- ARRL> RMDR (Reciprocal Mixing Dynamic Range) if Phase 
Noise Limited as the> deciding factor.>> We are
  both amazed at the difference of close in spec's between these> two radios!> 
97 for the 7300 VS only 78 for the 7410,, is it really that much> 
difference!?>> Wow!>> So am I to think correctly in a Field Day setting would 
the 7300 be the> better radio?>> Joe WB9SBD>> 
_______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> 
CQ-Contest@contesting.com> 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>> 
_______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> 
CQ-Contest@contesting.com> 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>_______________________________________________CQ-Contest
 mailing 
listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>