CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] earbuds?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] earbuds?
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 16:40:19 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 8/30/2021 12:29 PM, K9MA wrote:
but I would beware of any modern NC headset, even wired, until tested for latency. The old analog NC headsets have no latency issues but, alas, they're also not very good at cancelling noise.

Great advice. There are two sources of latency -- BlueTooth and DSP. There are (at least) two versions of BluTooth; one is high power for maximum range and greater latency, and low power for lower latency. When DSP was first developed for pro sound reinforcement (in the early '90s, as I recall), we learned a LOT about latency, and much of the following development was directed both at minimizing latency and controlling it in our system designs.

ANY latency in monitoring of manually sending CW is a train wreck; more than 30-40 msec will make it increasingly difficult to talk while hearing your voice delayed, and I suspect would lead to fatique. I've heard VERY experienced announcers slow down and stop talking with acoustic latency in the range of 80-100 msec resulting from time of flight from loudspeakers in stadiums or at music festivals.

73, Jim K9YC



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>