Then, perhaps N4ZR will let us know the "real" reason for K1AR's warning
about the consequences of unintended cluster access.
With regard to technological innovation, I an opposed to "assisted"
being considered a single-op category when it's clearly multi-op.
73,
Paul EI5DI
On 29/10/2021 02:59, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
I'd expect nothing less from you, Paul, given your long opposition to
all technological innovation - fact is, most cluster software has
set/nodx or the equivalent, to make sure no spots come your way when
you don't want them .
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 10/28/2021 5:38 PM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
It's simple - "unassisted" ops risk being DQed for accidental or
unintended cluster access/use.
73,
Paul EI5DI
On 28/10/2021 22:10, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
I don't understand, John. What are you worried about?
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 10/28/2021 4:54 PM, John Dorr wrote:
The CQWW rules allow for outbound spotting as an unassisted entry.
However, my advice is that if you are unassisted to avoid any use
of the cluster. You’re only inviting the possibility of unintended
access (or worse).
73, John, K1AR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|