CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Rules

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Rules
From: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:09:48 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So what is it you want, Jim?  

A rules change to accommodate you, at the expense of hundreds if not thousands 
of other participants?

73, Ron W3WN

> On Sep 17, 2022, at 6:32 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> 
> I've long enjoyed working QSO parties, and have won a few, but one scoring 
> rule for many of them discourage my participation, and caused me to avoid 
> them. The rule awarding multipliers to in-state stations for their counties 
> causes mobiles to avoid the higher bands while those bands are still open, 
> causing me to miss multipliers. I won't be on for TXQP and the Salmon Run, 
> both this weekend.
> 
> Other parties that I've worked in the past but abandoned for that reason 
> include TNQP, NEQP, and PAQP.
> 
> Parties that I will work include FLQP, GAQP, 7QP, and CQP.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>