CT-User
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ct-user] Re:RAC Scoring

To: k1ep@arrl.net, Geoff Clark <geoff.clark@clear.net.nz>,ct-user@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [ct-user] Re:RAC Scoring
From: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:41:02 -0500
List-post: <mailto:ct-user@contesting.com>
Just ran another test. Renamed "OFFICIAL.RAC" to "OFFICIAL.RAC_1" reran my test.
All "OFFICIAL RAC" stations scores as 10 points each.

Think this is your problem.

73
Bob, K1VU

At 19:29 12/29/2003 , R Johnson wrote:
>Just ran a dummy RAC contest using CT DOS 9.92.001.
>All "Official RAC" stations scored as 20 points each all other CAN as 10 
>points.
>
>Have you checked if your RAC.DAT and OFFICIAL.RAC files are there and up to 
>date ?
>Just a thought.
>
>73
>Bob, K1VU
>
>At 17:40 12/29/2003 , Ed Parish K1EP wrote:
> >At 12/29/03 04:17 PM, Geoff Clark wrote:
> > >At 06:00 30/12/03, Derrick wrote:
> > >
> > >>Has anyone asked the guy who gets the logs, I think VE7CFD, what formats 
> > >>he
> > >>can accept?
> > >
> > >Yep, the RAC Cabrillo format is on the RAC website, 
> > >http://www.rac.ca/downloads/raccabrillo.pdf .
> > >
> > >Regarding the scoring of RAC stations, I worked VE7RAC,  9.92.001 (DOS) 
> > >scored them correctly at 20 points. Is the problem only with the Windoze 
> > >version?
> >
> >That is strange.  I was using the DOS version, 9.92.001 and all the RAC 
> >stations were scored as 10 points...
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CT-User mailing list
> >CT-User@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
> >CT on the web:  http://www.k1ea.com/
>
>_______________________________________________
>CT-User mailing list
>CT-User@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
>CT on the web:  http://www.k1ea.com/

_______________________________________________
CT-User mailing list
CT-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
CT on the web:  http://www.k1ea.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>