>Shame, guess OUR FCC has no authority in Canada. According to what I have
>seen as the projected affected area, we will suffer problems created in
>Canada as well. HF propagation won't stay in Canada.
>
>73, de Jim KG0KP
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Roger Parsons" <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
>To: <rfi@contesting.com>; <tca@igs.net>; <ve3iq@rac.ca>; <ve3xk@rac.ca>
>Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 7:34 PM
>Subject: [RFI] BPL in Canada
>
>
>Was depressed to read this press release in the
>Toronto Star this evening:
>
http://www.amperion.com/press.asp?pid=94
>It appears that the power utility in Sault Ste Marie,
>PUC Inc, is about to install a trial BPL system with
>full deployment just as soon as they can make it
>happen.
>
>73 Roger
>VE3ZI
Yes its too bad. I have seen little response from our I.C. (equiv. of the
FCC) on this matter. Which begs the question, where the hell is RAC in all
this? Why has it not mounted a similiar campaign to the ARRL's. Did they
think they swine were going to stay south of the border?
K, Nesbitt, VE6IV
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.574 / Virus Database: 364 - Release Date: 1/29/2004
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|