I encourage hams in BPL areas to be active. But the tone of some of the posts
I have seen is downright scary, and there was no doubt what some had in mind.
Intentionally interfering with anything is not a permitted one-way transmission.
Ed Hare, W1RFI
ARRL Laboratory Manager
225 Main St
Newington, CT 06013
Tel: 860-594-0318
Internet: W1RFI@arrl.org
Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis
Member: ASC C63 EMC Committee
Chairman: Subcommittee 5, Immunity
Chairman: Ad hoc BPL Working Group
Member: IEEE SCC-28 RF Safety
Member: Society of Automotive Engineers EMC/EMR Committee
Member: IEEE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rfi-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of Dave NØRQ
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:36 PM
> To: rfi@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference
>
>
> We must remember that the two options mentioned below are
> like night and day. One is highly illegal and unethical. The other
> is using our legal privileges to transmit on frequencies that we
> are licensed for. Would it be wise to park a mobile beacon
> under a BPL box? Probably not. Should we stop transmitting
> completely because of nasty BPL noise? I certainly hope not.
> There is a balance to be struck -- where that line is exactly
> will no doubt remain a subject of debate.
> --
> Dave NØRQ
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Subject: Re: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference
>
>
> > The few posts I have see from hams offering to "solve" the
> > BPL problem by parking 500-watt mobile stations under the
> > lines or engaging in some good old target practice should
> > alert anyone that such information should not be published
> > openly.>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|