I believe that their proposal uses a loophole in satellite
regs.
They are pretending to be a satellite service with ground-
based "fills" but are really a ground-based service where
the satellite is merely a technique to avoid proper regs.
They are proposing some absurd number of 44KW transmitters
all over the country.
It is clearly a frighteningly-corrupted process with no
regard whatsoever for ethics or safety and it needs to be
stopped.
The company has connections inside the current administration,
if that provides some perspective ...
>> I still want to know how they get those massive land-based
>> transmitters past the EPA ... sure seems like a *dangerous*
>> level of RF at *near-microwave* spectrum blasting through
>> the air.
>
> I haven't followed this closely ... but is it much different than
> cellphone antennas mounted on the sides or roof of an apartment or
> office building?
>
> Given enough demand for bandwidth that people will pay for, concerns
> about interference and even safety fall by the wayside.
>
> Andy
--
Thanks! & 73, KD4E
David Colburn http://kd4e.com
SE-GA Tailgate - April 9th, 2011
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day
I don't google I SEARCH! http://ixquick.com
Shop Freedom-Friendly http://kd4e.com/of.html
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|