RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Comparing Lightning Arrestors?

To: 'RFI List' <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Comparing Lightning Arrestors?
From: "doc@kd4e.com" <doc@kd4e.com>
Reply-to: doc@kd4e.com
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:53:34 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I could put the blocking arrestor after the HD-1480 switch and ground
it to the connex (steel shipping container) and then a non-blocking
one at the entrance to the house - grounded to the whole-house common
ground.

That would peel-off much of the lightning surge and help to defend
the receiver(s) better than only the non-blocking arrestor at the
house, would it not?

I understand that in the added device there is some small loss and
an added step of potential hardware failure (not only the device
but the extra coax jumper).

> The reason for the DC Block is that the protector device (gas tube,
> MOV, or whatever) conducts once a certain voltage is reached. By blocking
> DC, the voltage across the protector rises faster and it starts conducting
> at a much lower energy point of the discharge, keeping more energy out of
> the equipment. Offers extra protection for receivers. The situation for the
> tower mounted preamps mentioned by Frank, where the protectors pass DC, in
> the amp, the pickoff for power blocks the DC so the lightning protector does
> not need the block to achieve the same level of protection. --Mike, WV2ZOW


-- 

Thanks! & 73, KD4E
David Colburn http://kd4e.com
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day
I don't google I SEARCH!  STARTPAGE.com
Shop Freedom-Friendly http://kd4e.com/of.html
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>