RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Is a low pass filter necessary?

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Is a low pass filter necessary?
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 22:52:38 -0500
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Even though I know that modern rigs don't need one and that modern 
amplifiers don't need one and that VHF TV is dead as a door nail (or 
is that coffin nail?), I anachronistically use one. The insertion 
loss is negligible in my case and it does no harm. Besides, if anyone 
has the temerity to complain about RFI, I can point at it and say 
"See? I'm doing my part. Proper filtering. Nothing here is broken!"

Kim N5OP

At 10:41 PM 5/10/2012, John wrote:
>I was on an antennas reflector recently asking about the proper placement
>of a low pass filter and several members asked why am I using one at all.
>They said with the modern radios (I have an Icom 706 original) a low pass
>filter really isn't necessary, that most modern rigs already contain one
>and the spurrious emissions are already greatly reduced. So, what is the
>opinion of list members-with a modern rig, does having a low pass filter in
>line really help to solve any additional problems?
>
>John AF5CC
>_______________________________________________
>RFI mailing list
>RFI@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>