Hi Paul,
That is exactly my concern, thank you for the legal view on it. Can you
think of any way in which this could be approached? I have also
contacted the ARRL Volunteer Attorney, whom I know as well. What a
sticky mess this stuff is... I just want to use my radio! Thank you
for your time in this BTW.
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 14:21 -0600, Paul Christensen wrote:
> > It would be nice if the ARRL would ask their Attorney about question 1,
> > and post the response here in addition to anyone who might be an
> > attorney speaking out.
>
> I doubt the ARRL's legal counsel would issue an opinion as to question 1.
> I'm an attorney but you're dealing with matters of both federal and state
> law -- and they sometimes conflict with one another. Just because your
> state may allow certain use of a controlled substance for medicinal purposes
> does not automatically mean you can aide in the production of a controlled
> substance. You may not think your involvement with RFI filtering is aiding,
> but the law may state otherwise.
>
> Rendering an opinion on a state law matter must come from an attorney
> licensed in the state of the matter in question. Any state-licensed
> attorney can potentially answer questions of federal law. I would seek an
> Oregon-licensed attorney to answer this question.
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|