Agreed. It neither sounds like nor spectrally looks like CODAR.
I suppose it would be good if it were CODAR, as anecdotally they seem to be
reasonably approachable, and responsive to QRM complaints.
Tuming right now to 4580 Khz reveals two CODAR transmitters sweeping away, over
a span of about 600 Khz. Much different sounding than the 1916 signal.
Scott. NM8R
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 9:11 PM, Scott Yost
<nm8rmedic@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Agreed. It neither sounds like nor spectrally looks like CODAR.
I suppose it would be good if it were CODAR, as anecdotally they seem to be
reasonably approachable, and responsive to QRM complaints.
Tuming right now to 4580 Khz reveals two CODAR transmitters sweeping away, over
a span of about 600 Khz. Much different sounding than the 1916 signal.
Scott. NM8R
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 8:56 PM, Patrick <wa4tuk-rf@comcast.net>
wrote:
Still doesn't sound (to me) like what I found on the net for CODAR;
however if you are sure then so be it.
I don't hear it tonight so maybe the email "static/hoopla/general fuss"
helped scare it away. All together a good result. Now that it's gone I
am reduced to griping about the local line noise and my neighbors fence.
(Still an improvement !)
;-)
Pat
wa4tuk
> Sounds like daily monitoring of CODAR for twenty plus years and about a
> dozen other CODAR signals heard across HF at the same time up to 26 MHz,
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|