RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RFI With Smoke Detectors

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI With Smoke Detectors
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:42:12 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On Wed,8/19/2015 12:29 PM, Stan Zawrotny wrote:
Frank,

Does the interference to the smoke detectors occur at very low RF
output...say 5 or 10 watts?  Or does it occur only AT higher output levels.
It increases with power. Gets really bad when I kick in the linear.

What about 5-10 W?

Have you attempted to contact the importer or manufacturer to inquire about
the application of bypass caps to AC power lines or battery leads as well
as other parts of the device to minimize the effect of RF on the chirp
circuit?
An email to the manufacturer, USI Electric Inc., went unanswered.

Have you considered the telephone? Have you contacted the installing contractor?

My antenna is an 80-6 meter OCF up about 40 feet in the trees.

An OCF antenna is a recipe for LOTS of RF conducted onto the feedline and into your home.

I don't think it is radiating back into the house.

I'm pretty certain that it IS.

The house is ICF construction with a tin roof. I essentially live in a Faraday 
cage. I have to go outside to use my cell phone. The house will withstand a cat 
5 hurricane or tornado.

The cell phone is UHF, your ham rig is HF.

That OCF antenna, by virtue of its imbalance, puts a LOT of common mode RF current on the feedline, which penetrates what you THINK is a Faraday cage (and it's NOT a Faraday cage unless the metal completely encloses the area you're trying to shield, AND all the metal parts continuously bonded together). And when you penetrate that structure with that feedline, it completely defeats any shielding that you think you have.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>