RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Switching Power Supply test Video

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Switching Power Supply test Video
From: Michael Coslo <mcoslo@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 15:54:49 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
The antenna is a 96 foot doublet roughly 55 feet above the radio, and directly 
above it. Fed with ladder line.

One of the most important aspects of this is that I make no assertion that 
there is no hash. I show it in fact. and at frequencies that it happens at.   
At the end of the video I note that this is not a rigid test, but something a 
typical Amateur might experience.

The interference I chose to show that was visible is below the AM Broadcast 
band. And it is there. The noise floor on the BCB  was too high to get anything 
of use there. But if you were working the experimental bands there, you 
wouldn’t want to use a switcher. For a clean source, I’d suggest batteries.

Unfortunately, it is not always possible to get meaningful results with 
meaningful defined as tightly controlled laboratory conditions. I would love to 
see the work that has the lab results.  Anyone have the cites or could grant 
access to their own work in this area? It would be especially helpful to see 
the tests done on the Alinco in question, but I’m willing to be educated by 
seeing the meaningful tests on any Switch mode power supply.

-73 de Mike N3LI -

> On Aug 7, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Paul Christensen <pchristensen@ieee.org> wrote:
> 
>> "1) there's no information about antennas in use, or how close they were to
> the shack. 
> 
> And that's probably the most influential factor.  The proximity of the SMPS
> to antennas, lines, and equipment mean everything.  We often hear/see
> reports that "brand X" supply is quiet and produces no hash.   That
> statement may only be true in that one installation.  We all have different
> installations that can have a profound effect on the degree of SMPS
> interference.   
> Meaningful results require thorough EMC testing, using regulatory and
> industry-standard testing methodology.
> 
> Paul, W9AC 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>