RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] New Larger Fair-Rite #31 Toroid

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] New Larger Fair-Rite #31 Toroid
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:23:49 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Optimum depends on the frequency and the diameter of the coax. Like I said in the post below, I would expect this new core to be roughly equivalent to two of the 2.4-in diameter cores.

73, Jim K9YC

On Sun,3/26/2017 5:17 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
Jim,
What would you estimate the optimal number of turns to be for this ferrite?

73s and thanks,
Dave
NK7Z
http://www.nk7z.net

On 03/26/2017 04:22 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
KY8D asked me about a new, larger #31 toroid that has recently been
added to the catalog. It's 4-in o.d., 3-in i.d, and 1-inch long.

http://www.fair-rite.com/product/round-cable-emi-suppression-cores-2631814002/


Note the impedance data for 1, 3, and 5 turns at the bottom of the page.

Gan's email arrived today (Sunday) so I haven't had the opportunity yet
to investigate pricing. My guess is at least double the cost of the
2.4-in toroid, but because it's twice the length (1-in as opposed to
0.5-in for the 2.4-in toroid), a single core will likely be equivalent
to two of the 2.4-in cores, so fewer cores will be required to achieve
the same choking Z. More important, the much larger i.d. will allow more
turns and/or larger coax.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>