1. I use LoTW and like it.
2. I don't use eQSL and won't say why because I don't want to start a flame
war.
3. I do use the ARRL Outgoing Bureau to respond to QSL requests from DX.
4. I use direct QSLs for DX I want if they don't use LoTW.
5. From my current call I have about 18,000 QSOs in LoTW of which about half
have QSLs. I find that RTTY QSLs are more likely to be in LoTW than SSB or
CW QSLs.
The question I would add is: If you do not use LoTW, what would encourage
you to use it? I look forward to seeing the responses you get.
73, Susan
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Don W5FKX <w5fkx@cox.net> wrote:
> Although this may be a bit off-topic, I hope that it is not objectionable.
> I am conducting an informal survey of QSLing methods and would very much
> appreciate your input. Please respond directly to me.
>
> 1. Do you use the Logbook of the World (LOTW)?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 2. Do you use the eQSL service?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 3. Do you use the QSL Bureau system?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 4. Do you send out direct QSLs?
> If not, what has kept you from doing so?
> 5. What is the approximate percentages of your QSLs received via:
> LOTW
> eQSL
> Bureau
> Direct
>
> Thanks very much for your participation. Any additional comments are
> welcome.
>
> 73,
> Don W5FKX
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|