SM5FUG:
1. Yes
2. No. One electronic log book is enough for
me and I don't like to encourage a second.
3. Yes. I send cards for ragchew QSOs and I reply
to all cards I receive this way.
4. Yes, for stations I need QSL from that only use direct
route. If somebody sends a direct QSL to me he/she will get a reply
direct if postage is enclosed.
5.
LoTW: 25% new QSOs, 14% in total from my start on the air 1972.
eQSL: I don't know
Bureau: 15% last years, higher earlier.
Direct: 1%
I work a mixture of RTTY-contests, CW-contests, local Swedish contests,
DX-hunting and ragchew QSOs. The propotion of RTTY-contests has decreased
the last years since I changed QTH and only (so far) use wire antennas.
73's de Jan
> Although this may be a bit off-topic, I hope that it is not objectionable. I
> am conducting an informal survey of QSLing methods and would very much
> appreciate your input. Please respond directly to me.
>
> 1. Do you use the Logbook of the World (LOTW)?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 2. Do you use the eQSL service?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 3. Do you use the QSL Bureau system?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 4. Do you send out direct QSLs?
> If not, what has kept you from doing so?
>
> 5. What is the approximate percentages of your QSLs received via:
> LOTW
> eQSL
> Bureau
> Direct
>
> Thanks very much for your participation. Any additional comments are welcome.
>
> 73,
> Don W5FKX
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|