All in favor, AYE!!!
The SO2R ops in the contesting community are in my mind like olympic
atheletes... in a class by themselves. Within a few miles of my QTH there are
several great examples of superb SO2R ops, including W0YK, K6XX, K9YC,
K6RB.... These guys have made investments in hardware, software, and operating
capabilities that really do set them apart from most of the rest of us. And
this comes about in part from a motivation to exploit existing contest rules,
and win contests! (KB OM) More power to them! But, real comparisons of
station/operating skillsets come from comparable circumstances. N6CK is an
SO1R station.... at least for now.
Greg - N6CK
________________________________
From: Martin Bluhm <w8aks55@gmail.com>
To: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; K5NZ@aol.com
Cc: rtty@contesting.com
Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 7:41:07 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY
I second Jim's proposal. That would even the playing field which is tilted
at the present time.
My .02 also.
Thanks Jim.
73
Marty
W8AKS
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of James Colville
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 02:16
To: K5NZ@aol.com
Cc: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY
Here's what I don't like....
That single ops can run 2 radios and compete against those of us that choose
not to run 2 radios.
I think that 2 radio contesting should put you into the multi transmitter
class.
My .02$
73
Jim W7RY
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:15 PM, <K5NZ@aol.com> wrote:
> As the landscape of a contest changes I think tweaks are a good thing for
> everyone..
>
>
> Sent to ARRL Contest Branch:
>
>
> First, thanks for supporting this fine contest!
>
> Next I would like to submit for your consideration the addition of another
> category. In the past several years the participation in the contest has
> increased every year. I would like to suggest the addition of a M2 or MM
> category. Some of the "mega" stations are now finding the fun in RTTY
and
> putting together teams for this event. Why not give them a better venue
> to
> compete while leaving the MS class for stations more suited for this
> class.
> I think this would keep the MS, for those with more limited resources,
> very competitive and not disadvantage them having to compete with the big
> MM
> stations. It would also give the MM stations more to do with the
> operators
> they have assembled. As I have said many times, I think RTTY will be the
> "new" CW as far as rate because so many casual operators are enjoying the
> mode. And after last weekend with rates in the 180's, I think it is
> almost
> there!
>
> I hope you will consider this addition, I will step up and offer to
sponsor
> the plaque for this category the first year if you decide to add it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Hance K5NZ
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.124/2599 - Release Date: 01/04/10
08:24:00
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|