On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Kok Chen wrote:
> unless it is some maximum a priori (MAP) scheme
> that has gone awry.
Oops, I meant "maximum a posteriori (MAP)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_a_posteriori_estimation
MAP for RTTY has been investigated by a few people.
Alex VE3NEA had told me some time back of his use of MAP to improve the
printing of RTTY contest exchanges. His CW Skimmer program probably
incorporates many of those ideas and more.
More recently, Rob KL7NA had kindly sent me a paper that he and one of his
students wrote on the use of some MAP schemes for RTTY decoding. In an email,
Rob had mentioned to me that they found MAP to be of lesser impact than using
linear a-priori methods such as matched filtering.
73
Chen, W7AY
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|