[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SD-User] No Prefix

Subject: Re: [SD-User] No Prefix
From: Neill Taylor <>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:19:45 +0000
List-post: <>
Or why not just "5NN 14". That should satisfy all callers and get that QSO finished in double-quick time. Or, in fact, we all know the exchange will be 5NN 14, so "TU" should suffice.

For me, a QSO hasn't taken place unless the other guy has sent my callsign (all of it).


At 18:33 04/12/03 +0000, Tim EI8CI wrote:
I wonder if it is more helpful to send 'G3 5NN 14' rather than 'RWL 5NN 14'
From: "Richard W L Limebear" <>
> Listening to CQWW I couldn't help but notice a (to me) new culture in the
> contest exchanges; slick operators in a "run" were only sending the suffix
> of callsigns. e.g. not "G3RWL 5NN14" but "RWL 5NN14".

SD-User mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>