SD-User
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SD-User] No Prefix

To: sd-user@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [SD-User] No Prefix
From: Neill Taylor <ntaylor@breathemail.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:19:45 +0000
List-post: <mailto:sd-user@contesting.com>
Or why not just "5NN 14". That should satisfy all callers and get that QSO finished in double-quick time. Or, in fact, we all know the exchange will be 5NN 14, so "TU" should suffice.

For me, a QSO hasn't taken place unless the other guy has sent my callsign (all of it).

Neill
G4HLX

At 18:33 04/12/03 +0000, Tim EI8CI wrote:
I wonder if it is more helpful to send 'G3 5NN 14' rather than 'RWL 5NN 14'
...snip...
From: "Richard W L Limebear" <Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk>
> Listening to CQWW I couldn't help but notice a (to me) new culture in the
> contest exchanges; slick operators in a "run" were only sending the suffix
> of callsigns. e.g. not "G3RWL 5NN14" but "RWL 5NN14".
...snip...





_______________________________________________
SD-User mailing list
SD-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>