TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Tubes sounds great...

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Tubes sounds great...
From: Michael O. Hyder" <N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 10:54:55 -0400
This feller answered the puzzlement -- case closed (see below).

Trouble today with a CW only rig is that little additional circuitry is
required to make it a SSB rig, too.  That was not the case in the AM days
when a good modulator was as expensive as the RF deck.  The screen
modulation of the DX-40, etc., was not too swift, although cheaper.

Limiting the market for a rig today by making it CW only would surely serve
some of us, but at the expense of many sales.  It's probably not a
worthwhile venture for Ten-Tec to make such a rig methinks.

73 de Mike N4NT@wireco.net

----- Original Message -----
From: Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu>
To: James D. Duffer <jduffer@mnsinc.com>
Cc: Larry Kayser <kayser@rideau.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Tubes sounds great...


>
> The heathkit transmitter ya'll have been referring to was
> the HX-1681.....they did make them, for about 18 months..
> It was a decent xmtr, as was the companion HR 1680 RX...
> they were little 'twins', introduced at a relatively high
> price when CW activity was down, and with WARC bands
> on the horizon....construction was similar to the "104"
> series, and Heath had a TERRIBLE reputation from those
> rigs....
<<rest hacked>>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>