Hi, Jason,
I have owned both the Scout and the Alinco DX-70TH, which is much more
comparable to the Scout than the much larger DX-77. The Alinco was a good
radio, and the narrow 1khz SSB filter was great for reducing adjacent
channel interference in much the same way the Jones filter does on the
Scout. The catch: the DX-77 you are considering does *not* have this
feature. Oh, and the Jones filter is a variable bandwidth IF filter, so it
is far more flexible than what Alinco offers.
So... with all those bells and whistles, you still won't have a really good
way to get rid of adjacent signals, which the Scout *does* have. IMHO,
since I care about how comfortably I can hear the signal I want to hear
without getting a headache, the Scout is a better value. The Scout, IMHO,
also has the better receiver in terms of sensitivity.
You may also want to consider a used Argosy, as I have done. The Argosy is
more like the DX-77 in size, and has the distinct disadvantage of not
covering 12, 17, and 160 meters. However, it has an excellent array of
filter choices (which the Alinco does not), and a notch filter for
eliminating heterodynes. It has an excellent receiver, and provides you
with an even lower cost option.
I am not "religious" when it comes to Ten Tec, but for reliability, service,
and performance, they have outperformed anything else I have had, including
the Alinco. Ham radio is a hobby for me. It's a chance to meet people all
over the world and learn and exchange ideas. As a ragchewer and often a
QRPer, I want a nice, simple, quality radio that won't let me down when I
feel like operating. Ten Tec fits that bill nicely.
My opinion, like all others, is worth exactly what you paid for it :)
73,
Caity
KU4QD
>
> >Hello everyone-
> >I'm planning to pick up a compact rig around the holliday season for
> >mobile/portable use, as well as some use in a fixed location. I am
> >considering the Alinco DX-77 or the Ten Tec Scout for this purpose. I am
a
> >Ten Tec fan, and run an Omni D series B as my main base station.
However,
> >it appears the DX-77 may be a better rig for the money. I figure that a
> >Scout, equipped with all of the band modules I would want, will cost
about
> >the same as a DX-77. It looks like the DX-77 has quite a few more
features
> >for the same price. Is there anyone on the reflector with experience with
> >both rigs? Any input would be appreciated.
> >Thanks,
> >Jason KA7UAM
> >
> >
> >--
> >FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> >Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> >Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> >Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
> >Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
> | 73's KA5PPX - Robert McAdams - TechPlus - ARRL
> | http://www.arrl.org Grid locator: EM13lk
> | Lat: 33° 26' 50"n Lon: 97° 2' 43"w
> | http://www.mapblast.com format:
> | Lat: 33.44725 Lon:97.045535
> | Dallas Semi Conductor weather site locator:
> | (Select Lake Ray Roberts, Texas)
> | http://198.3.123.122/WeatherStation/WeatherApplet.html
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|