TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] newbie question

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] newbie question
From: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 08:28:42 -0700
My personal preference is for a ham bands only rig.  I have plenty of other
GC receivers around for SWLing.

Reid, K7YX

 -----Original Message-----
From:   SFIKE@twa.com [mailto:SFIKE@twa.com] 
Sent:   Thursday, October 28, 1999 3:26 PM
To:     tentec@contesting.com
Subject:        [TenTec] newbie question


I am trying to decide if it is better for a transciever to NOT have a
general
coverage receiver. There seems to be a couple of schools of thought on this.
Some say the rig will perform better on the ham-only-bands if it doesn't
have
GC. Some like to have GC to SWL and it also seems to help on the resale
value
somewhat but at the cost of ham-band-only performance when you are
"hamming"!
Is this true? I would like to hear what everyones opinion on this is.
Thanks,
73
Scott,kc0bus


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>