TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Ten Tec Performance

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance
From: CAlderma@ora.fda.gov (Alderman, Chester)
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:04:18 -0400
Sorry but I disagree with you on this..! I think this reflector is a GOOD
place to compare Ten Tec rigs to all other brands of radios.

Tom/W4BQF

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tentec@contesting.com [mailto:owner-tentec@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Robert McAdams
Sent: May 03, 2000 12:31 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance



AHMEN!

Can we put this one to rest now?



At 08:27 PM 5/2/00, K2ZF@aol.com wrote:

>Hello Ten Tec fans,
>I have owned a number of high end radios, Yaesu and Icom. There was not one
>of them that did not have some kind quirk that bothered me. I have been a
Ten
>Tec fan for 13 years and owned many of their radios. The Omni 6+ is by far
>the best of the long line of gear manufactured by Ten Tec. Sure, there are
a
>few things that bother me, but for the buck we get a good product, maybe
not
>great, but good. There is something about the way the cw sounds coming out
of
>the Omni's speaker that the competition can't match. I look at my radios as
>compared to as looking at my friends. My friends may have their faults, but
>the good points are more important. The Omni 6+ is no different, the good
>points counter the bad ones, hands down. Just how much money are we willing
>to pay for our radios ? For the money, I believe we have a good radio.
>73 de Jim   K2ZF

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>